OPEN
Create one matter
Give one project, case, intake, or investigation its own focused space.
How Firmy works
Collect the context.
Let Firmy connect the pieces.
Give Firmy the full picture.
Add files, notes, photos, messages, dates, and context in any order. Firmy waits until you say you’re finished.
Start a matter →A simple workflow
Bring it together. Choose when Firmy begins.
COLLECT
Complete the picture
Add notes, pasted text, PDFs, office documents, photos, audio, folders, dates, and helpful context. Firmy waits.
BEGIN
Say when you’re finished
Select “I’m finished — organize” only after you have added everything you want Firmy to consider.
REVIEW
See how it connects
Review timelines, facts, people, missing information, and open questions—with links back to what you added.
What Firmy can do
One place to understand everything that matters.
Organize the full picture, explore how the pieces connect, then ask careful questions or get help drafting.
Give Firmy the full picture first
Keep adding material and context without getting an answer after every entry.
Files, photos, and folders
Collect large materials in resilient pieces so one oversized request does not discard the whole upload.
See where each answer came from
Firmy links important statements back to the original material and labels inference or uncertainty.
Ask with the full context
AI Chat considers everything you added, the latest organized workspace, and the earlier conversation before responding.
Look beyond what you added
Search the current web with visible citations while keeping web results separate from your own materials.
Review dates before adding
Turn matter dates into proposed deadlines, meetings, reminders, and events—then approve each item and export it to your calendar.
Catch overstatement
Find unsupported claims, contradictions, missing context, repeated questions, and wording that outruns the evidence.
Keep matters separated
Authenticated workspaces isolate each account’s matters; private uploads are retrieved through ownership-checked routes.
Ways to organize
See the same picture in different ways.
A lens is simply a way to organize what you added. Choose up to six views and compare them in the same workspace.
What happened, and in what order?
- ChronologicalDates, time, and sequence
- Event reconstructionUnified incidents from multiple sources
- Conversation threadsEmails, texts, chats, and replies
Who, what, and where are related?
- People & entitiesPeople, companies, and identifiers
- Relationship mapConnections among people, events, and sources
- LocationsAddresses, businesses, and places
How well is it supported?
- Fact extractionIndividual facts linked to their sources
- Evidence strengthSupport, conflicts, and limitations
- Missing informationMissing pieces, dates, and answers
Additional views
Confidence scoring · Topic clusters · Semantic similarity · Source type · Duplicate detection · Version history · Workflow stage · Knowledge graph
Open a matter and choose lenses →10 prompts worth trying
Questions that help make sense of the full picture.
Use these in Ask Firmy after adding the relevant material. Firmy considers the matter as a whole and links answers back to what you provided.
01
Build the chronology
Read the complete matter before answering. Build a chronological timeline of every dated or sequential event. Cite the source for each entry, preserve conflicting dates, and label anything inferred or uncertain.
02
Separate fact from inference
Review the whole record and create three sections: facts explicitly stated in a source, reasonable inferences, and unresolved uncertainties. Cite every item and do not turn an allegation into an established fact.
03
Find contradictions
Compare every account, report, message, and record in this matter. Identify contradictions, date conflicts, wording changes, and facts that cannot all be true at once. Explain the source of each conflict without deciding who is credible.
04
Create an exhibit index
Create a clean exhibit index from the collected files. Include a proposed exhibit number, filename, date, source, short neutral description, and the factual point the item may help verify. Flag duplicates and unreadable or missing items.
05
Identify what is missing
What information or evidence is missing before this record can be responsibly evaluated? Group the gaps by people, documents, dates, authentication, damages, and follow-up. Explain why each gap matters.
06
Compare two accounts
Compare the principal accounts in this matter side by side. List points of agreement, direct conflicts, details mentioned by only one source, and questions that would test each difference. Use neutral language and source citations.
07
Prepare interview questions
Using the full matter, prepare concise follow-up questions for the next interview. Do not repeat questions already answered. Prioritize questions that clarify timelines, identify corroborating sources, or resolve contradictions.
08
Draft a record-grounded summary
Draft a concise professional matter summary using only the supplied record. Use natural language, distinguish allegations from verified facts, cite the supporting sources, and exclude legal conclusions that the evidence does not establish.
09
Review a draft for credibility
Review my draft against the complete matter. Identify statements that overreach the evidence, sound dramatic, omit important context, conflict with another section, or need a source. Suggest concise revisions that improve accuracy and credibility.
10
Plan the next review
Based on the complete record, create a prioritized review plan. Start with the items most likely to change the factual picture, then list verification tasks, people to contact, records to obtain, and questions to preserve for professional legal review.
Bring everything together